Constitutional Court to rule on prisoner pardons

The Constitutional Court will rule on Tuesday on whether 384 prisoners, some serving sentences for murder and robbery, are entitled to apply for political pardons. Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) chief whip Koos van der Merwe said on Monday he hoped the matter would "finally be resolved" six years after applications for presidential pardon were made. "Most of them are in jail for serious crimes, such as murder and robbery -- allegedly political," Van der Merwe told Sapa. "Not all of them are IFP members. But the point is that in six years the department of justice has done nothing. Even if only five of the prisoners qualify for a pardon, then they will have languished in prison for nothing."

Van der Merwe said the Ministry of Justice had been incompetent and arrogant in dealing with the issue. It was an international scandal, he said. "The gross violation of the human rights of these prisoners reflects badly on South Africa as a whole. Government's deliberate lack of action is clearly a violation of the spirit of our Constitution and we are therefore confident that the court will rule in our favour tomorrow."

The prisoners first applied for pardons six years ago, but their applications were dismissed on "technical grounds". The IFP then took the issue to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) which ordered former justice minister Brigitte Mabandla to finalise the applications within three months. The IFP took Mabandla to court after she ignored the SAHRC ruling. "Subsequently, the IFP took the matter to the High Court of South Africa who also made a ruling against Mabandla ordering her to finalise the matter within three months," Van der Merwe said.

Mabandla then applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which was granted. Five judges of the Supreme Court of Appeal unanimously rejected Mabandla's appeal. Mabandla then appealed to the Constitutional Court. The IFP laid a complaint against former president Thabo Mbeki and Mabandla with Amnesty International.

Van der Merwe said the IFP's lawyer had informed him that President Jacob Zuma had filed an affidavit on the case late on Monday. "They have had six years to do something about this, but they leave it until late in the final afternoon on the day before the case. It is remarkably incompetent."

Source: Mail & Guardian

South Africa: report reveals dire conditions facing farm workers

A report, recently released by the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), has highlighted the appalling conditions faced by South African farm workers.

The report was the result of an inquiry launched by the SAHRC in June 2001, in response to an increasing number of reports of brutality towards farm workers, execrable working and living conditions on farms, child labour practices and the ongoing murder of farmers.

The historical background to the deplorable conditions endured by South African farm workers lies generally in South Africa’s history of colonial conquest and dispossession of indigenous people, but more particularly in the 1913 Natives Land Act. This piece of legislation outlawed the ownership of land by blacks in areas designated for white ownership. Essentially, it solidified the distribution of land that emerged from the era of colonial wars against indigenous tribes and polities. It further sought to roll back black ownership of land in certain areas. The outcome was that 87 percent of land became white owned, whilst blacks were relegated to the remaining 13 percent.

According to the SAHRC report, an estimated 1.4 million people were evicted from farms in South Africa between 1950 and 1980. In 1997 the South African government promulgated the Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA), aimed at protecting occupants of rural land from arbitrary evictions.

Source: World Socialist Web