The mystery surrounding the seemingly violent death of acting Cape High Court judge and ANC struggle hero Patrick Ntobeko Maqubela continues to deepen. Maqubela was found dead in bed at his luxury seafront flat on Friday June 7 by fellow acting judge Jake Moloi, two days after police believe he died. Moloi said there was a pillow over his face and blood on both the pillow and the sheets.
Maqubela’s high-level political connections included former prosecutions chief Bulelani Ngcuka and Justice Minister Jeff Radebe. He played a crucial role at the 2003 Hefer Commission, set up to investigate claims that Ngcuka was an apartheid spy.
A Mail & Guardian investigation can reveal:
* Startling inconsistencies in the police version of the death, beginning with a bizarre pronouncement that he died of a “severe heart attack”. The police investigation was changed three days later to one of murder. Family members complained of being “left in the dark” about the police investigation, while his colleagues in the judiciary are equally perplexed by the handling of the case.
* Both heaters were switched on high in Maqubela’s room, causing rapid decomposition of the body. The weather bureau confirmed temperatures on the day of the death were mild, ranging from 18°C to 24°C. The bureau said police had visited them to discuss weather conditions on that day.
* Although she lives in Johannesburg, Maqubela’s wife, Thandi, was staying with her husband during the week of his death. On Thursday June 4, the day before police say he died, she is said to have visited Radebe in Cape Town, allegedly giving him reasons why her husband was unfit to be a judge. Radebe’s spokesperson, Tlali Tlali, refused to comment, saying: “The minister ... would not want to conduct himself in a manner that would call into question the integrity of a [police] investigation possibly currently under way.” Ngcuka also refused comment because of the “sensitivity” of the case.
* On the day of the death the Maqubelas had a mystery visitor, who left later the same day. On the same morning, a woman who identified herself as “Amanda” contacted Maqubela’s secretary at court to say he would not be in because he had been taken to Groote Schuur Hospital.
* Maqubela’s cellphone was used repeatedly over the weekend after his death, according to sources, and SMSes were sent from it to colleagues, family and friends telling them he would be out of contact. An SMS was also allegedly sent from the cellphone to Radebe, saying he had settled his differences with his wife.
Moloi found the body of 60-year-old Maqubela after he and others went looking for him at his Bantry Bay flat. Moloi disputed the police finding that his colleague had died of a heart attack. “I found him lying face up, with his arms by his side, a sheet tucked over him and with a pillow on top of his face,” said Moloi. “There was blood on the pillow and on the sheets. Who looks like that if they’ve had a heart attack?”
Top forensic scientist David Klatzow said he was puzzled that the state pathologist called to examine the body concluded he had died of a heart attack. “It was remarkably imprudent for a state pathologist to leap to that conclusion, based on a decomposing body and blood stains that were not characteristic of a heart attack,” said Klatzow.
A former Umkhonto weSizwe commander in KwaZulu-Natal, Maqubela gave testimony at the Hefer Commission in 2003 contradicting claims that Ngcuka had betrayed him to the apartheid security police. Family members say that he had taken out a life policy worth about R20-million and that his estate was valued at between R15-million and R20-million. He had a host of directorships in private companies. Family members also claimed that the couple’s often turbulent relationship was a source of distress to Maqubela, who had allegedly stalled divorce proceedings when his wife’s mother died. The couple is known to have received an unnamed visitor in their apartment on June 5. The visitor, a man, was announced by security officials at the apartment block who were given permission to send him up to the flat. There is video footage of all arrivals and departures. The mystery visitor left that morning, while Thandi allegedly left the building later that day.
Police spokesman Superintendent Andre Traut said police are still treating Maqubela’s death as a murder, but had no suspects. Two of Cape Town’s top detectives, Reynold Talmakkies and Jo Dryden, are investigating, but could not be reached for comment. Traut said the first postmortem could not determine the cause of death because of the state of decomposition of Maqubela’s body. “Bodily organs were sent away and a toxicology analysis was done, but the exact cause of death was inconclusive,” he said. Police had requested further tests from the provincial department of health, said Traut. But an exasperated provincial health spokesperson, Faiza Steyn, said she was “200% sure” no further tests had been carried out by her department. “We have handed over everything to police,” she said. Sources close to the investigation said the man who visited the couple at their flat had been taken in by police for questioning but had been released.
After several approaches by the M&G, Thandi Maqubela promised to answer questions at a later stage, but failed to do so. A law firm named Martins Weir Smith later wrote to the M&G stating that “we advise that counsel who has been instructed to represent our client (T Maqubela) is currently overseas and that he will attend to address [sic] a response to your aforementioned email subsequent to his return on 7 September 2009”. Moloi said he is haunted by Maqubela’s death. “Every day someone asks me if there has been a breakthrough in the case, and I thought about him as I walked into my chambers this morning. “I’d known him for 15 years. He wouldn’t hurt a fly. He was a smiling, likeable person,” he said. “I don’t think you ever get over finding someone like that. It was one of the biggest shocks of my life.”
Maqubela has taken some damning political secrets with him to the grave. His list of political connections reads like a who’s who of ANC luminaries, but Maqubela never publicly revealed the identity of “Mr X”, the man he believed betrayed him to the security police. A former Umkhonto weSizwe commander, trained in Swaziland, Maqubela was detained after his unit was accused of planting bombs at targets including Durban’s army recruitment centre.
Among the high-profile mourners who attended his funeral in his hometown of Qumbu, in the Eastern Cape, were the former prosecutions chief Bulelani Ngcuka and his wife Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, and Justice Minister Jeff Radebe and his wife Brigitte.
In his eulogy, Radebe described Maqubela as “a gallant soldier of ... Umkhonto weSizwe [who] contributed to many MK activities in and around Durban, making this city one of the most bombed cities during our struggle ... " Defended by Chief Justice Pius Langa, then a junior counsel, Maqubela was sentenced to 20 years in prison for high treason in 1982. He served nine years in Pollsmoor and Johannesburg Central prisons. He came to prominence when former foreign affairs official Mo Shaik and former transport minister Mac Maharaj alleged that Ngcuka had betrayed him to the security police. But Maqubela denied this when he testified before the Hefer Commission in Bloemfontein in 2003.
Ngcuka, his former housemate in Umlazi and Claremont, could not have been an apartheid spy, he told the commission. Ngcuka spent three years in prison in the 1980s for refusing to testify against Maqubela at his trial and did not betray him, Maqubela said. But, he said “Mr X”, a University of Natal student, was who he believed had “shopped” him and other KwaZulu-Natal underground ANC operatives to police. Maqubela threw a curve ball when he testified that Shaik and Maharaj knew Mr X’s identity. He told the commission he had learnt that Mr X compromised certain comrades who were killed in Swaziland. He had heard Mr X had committed suicide in Lusaka while in ANC detention. Former president Thabo Mbeki set up the Hefer Commission after allegations against Ngcuka in a City Press report, based on an investigation by ANC intelligence structures in 1989 and 1990 that found Ngcuka might have been police agent RS452.
The ANC investigation was led by Shaik, and Maharaj supported Shaik’s allegations by confirming the investigation. But the Hefer Commission found that Ngcuka “probably never” acted as an agent for the apartheid government. The M&G sent a list of questions to Ngcuka this week, including requests for a character reference for Maqubela and whether Ngcuka had shared business interests with the judge. Through his spokesperson, Sipho Ngwema, Ngcuka replied that he would not like to be “drawn into” the circumstances surrounding Maqubela’s death because of the “sensitivity” of the matter.
At the time of his death, Maqubela had notched up about 60 directorships, company records show. Some may have related to his work as an attorney and not have been his own. A number of the interests were in the field regulated by Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka when she was minerals and energy minister. He appeared as a director of companies, including Spear Petroleum, Karmaq Minerals, Royale Energy Africa and Eyabantu Petroleum. Some of his interests suggested particular proximity to the Ngcukas, including his directorship in Eyabantu Petroleum, alongside Mlambo-Ngcuka’s longtime adviser and spokesperson, Khanyo Gqulu, and Ilima Projects, which he chaired and involves two relatives of the Ngcukas. Maqubela met Ngcuka when they both joined a law firm in Durban and were admitted as attorneys in 1978. Maqubela was articled to Griffiths Mxenge, the Durban-based human rights lawyer assassinated by a police hit squad in 1981.
Maharaj said that he had heard that Maqubela told the Hefer Commission that he knew who Mr X was, but had no idea what he was talking about. “You would have had to ask him,” said Maharaj. “I can’t hope to clarify his imagination.” Shaik said he had known Maqubela as a comrade and was “deeply disturbed” to hear of his apparent murder. “One of the problems has been that too many of these murders in the country go unresolved,” he said. “I held him in high respect, and did not necessarily agree with what he said at the Hefer Commission, but he was a loyal comrade.” Shaik said he did not know who Maqubela referred to when he mentioned a Mr X at the commission.
Source: Mail & Guardian
Showing posts with label Mo Shaik. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mo Shaik. Show all posts
Friday, September 4, 2009
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
Zuma and Ngcuka in the spotlight once more
Another Hefer-style public hearing is near-inevitable as Public Protector Lawrence Mushwana pushes ahead with his investigation into Deputy President Jacob Zuma's allegation that Scorpions boss Bulelani Ngcuka abused his powers.
Just days after retired Judge Joos Hefer dismissed charges by Zuma's camp that Ngcuka had been a spy for the apartheid government, the Scorpions boss is facing an investigation that is likely to echo the dramatic scenes played out at Bloemfontein's Justice Building during the spy probe. Judge Hefer found that there was no substance to the spy allegation made against Ngcuka by two of Zuma's most trusted comrades, Mac Maharaj and Mo Shaik. The judge did not investigate their allegation that Ngcuka had abused his powers because this was not included in the terms of reference President Thabo Mbeki set for the commission.
Now, on the eve of the country's third democratic general elections, the ANC will be bracing itself for another bruising showdown between Zuma, the party's deputy president, and Ngcuka, one of the party's more senior heavyweights. In an interview with the Cape Times, Mushwana said he would meet Ngcuka this week to discuss Zuma's complaint that the Scorpions boss abused his office at the helm of the elite crime-busting unit as it investigated possible allegations of corruption against him. Now that Judge Hefer had made his findings public, Mushwana was pursuing the case and had studied documents relating to Zuma's complaint to the Public Protector. Although he was not keen on public hearings, which he described as the "agonising feature of the Hefer commission", Mushwana conceded that it would be difficult to hold oral hearings in private. Asked about the likelihood of a public hearing, he said: "We'll have to see. For a start, it's likely to be public. It will take a lot of effort to convince anyone that you can deal with a person of the stature of the deputy president behind closed doors. I don't wish it to go that way, but if it comes to that, then we definitely will have to do that."
Mushwana said his decision about holding oral hearings would depend on Ngcuka's written response to the allegation, but the chances of his investigation being based purely on affidavits were slim, given that he would "not be able to interrogate issues". According to Mushwana, Zuma's complaint was based largely on a statement Ngcuka made at a press conference on August 23 last year. Ngcuka said there was a prima facie case of corruption against Zuma, but that he would not prosecute as the case would not be "winnable" in court. "The deputy president is seriously challenging the use of that phrase. He is saying 'if there is such a case, then prosecute me, otherwise you must be prepared to withdraw the statement'," Mushwana said. Another of Zuma's reasons for his complaint was the alleged leaks by the Scorpions to the media about details of their investigation into his affairs. Third, Zuma was "seriously challenging the basis of the investigations" into his affairs. According to the Scorpions, Zuma was linked to an alleged attempt to solicit a payment of R500 000 a year from French company Thomson-CSF, which won a contract in the arms deal, in exchange for "protection" during the investigation into the deal.
Mushwana said Zuma was arguing that the probe into the arms deal by Mushwana's predecessor, Selby Baqwa, Ngcuka and Auditor-General Shauket Fakie had given no indication that the deputy president should be investigated. "(Zuma) said the conclusion of that investigation was that certain institutions were listed as warranting further investigation. He says he is not one of those institutions listed for further investigation and so now he doesn't... understand what it is that the Scorpions are investigating."
Mushwana said his office would sending Ngcuka a notice of the investigation and "his response will determine whether we should go down that (oral) painful road". On when he was likely to begin the investigation, Mushwana said: "If we decide to go the route of oral hearings, these people will have to have their legal representatives - one can't say exactly when, but from my side I'm almost ready to go."
Ngcuka's spokesperson, Makhosini Nkosi, said the National Prosecuting Authority was "prepared to co-operate with any investigation into (its) running by any agency of government". "We remain steadfast in our belief and assertion that there was never any abuse of office," said Nkosi. "We have nothing to fear and we want this matter to be dealt with speedily so we don't have further disturbances, as was the case when we were defending the spying allegations." Asked to comment on Zuma's complaint about Ngcuka's statement, Nkosi said: "The national director will state his case to the Public Protector - it's not for me to state his case in the press."
Lakela Kaunda, speaking for Zuma, said: "The deputy president submitted his complaint and awaits feedback from the Public Protector and has no comment on the processes or any aspect of the investigation."
# Maharaj and mining magnate Brett Kebble have also filed "abuse of office" complaints with Mushwana.
Source: IoL
Just days after retired Judge Joos Hefer dismissed charges by Zuma's camp that Ngcuka had been a spy for the apartheid government, the Scorpions boss is facing an investigation that is likely to echo the dramatic scenes played out at Bloemfontein's Justice Building during the spy probe. Judge Hefer found that there was no substance to the spy allegation made against Ngcuka by two of Zuma's most trusted comrades, Mac Maharaj and Mo Shaik. The judge did not investigate their allegation that Ngcuka had abused his powers because this was not included in the terms of reference President Thabo Mbeki set for the commission.
Now, on the eve of the country's third democratic general elections, the ANC will be bracing itself for another bruising showdown between Zuma, the party's deputy president, and Ngcuka, one of the party's more senior heavyweights. In an interview with the Cape Times, Mushwana said he would meet Ngcuka this week to discuss Zuma's complaint that the Scorpions boss abused his office at the helm of the elite crime-busting unit as it investigated possible allegations of corruption against him. Now that Judge Hefer had made his findings public, Mushwana was pursuing the case and had studied documents relating to Zuma's complaint to the Public Protector. Although he was not keen on public hearings, which he described as the "agonising feature of the Hefer commission", Mushwana conceded that it would be difficult to hold oral hearings in private. Asked about the likelihood of a public hearing, he said: "We'll have to see. For a start, it's likely to be public. It will take a lot of effort to convince anyone that you can deal with a person of the stature of the deputy president behind closed doors. I don't wish it to go that way, but if it comes to that, then we definitely will have to do that."
Mushwana said his decision about holding oral hearings would depend on Ngcuka's written response to the allegation, but the chances of his investigation being based purely on affidavits were slim, given that he would "not be able to interrogate issues". According to Mushwana, Zuma's complaint was based largely on a statement Ngcuka made at a press conference on August 23 last year. Ngcuka said there was a prima facie case of corruption against Zuma, but that he would not prosecute as the case would not be "winnable" in court. "The deputy president is seriously challenging the use of that phrase. He is saying 'if there is such a case, then prosecute me, otherwise you must be prepared to withdraw the statement'," Mushwana said. Another of Zuma's reasons for his complaint was the alleged leaks by the Scorpions to the media about details of their investigation into his affairs. Third, Zuma was "seriously challenging the basis of the investigations" into his affairs. According to the Scorpions, Zuma was linked to an alleged attempt to solicit a payment of R500 000 a year from French company Thomson-CSF, which won a contract in the arms deal, in exchange for "protection" during the investigation into the deal.
Mushwana said Zuma was arguing that the probe into the arms deal by Mushwana's predecessor, Selby Baqwa, Ngcuka and Auditor-General Shauket Fakie had given no indication that the deputy president should be investigated. "(Zuma) said the conclusion of that investigation was that certain institutions were listed as warranting further investigation. He says he is not one of those institutions listed for further investigation and so now he doesn't... understand what it is that the Scorpions are investigating."
Mushwana said his office would sending Ngcuka a notice of the investigation and "his response will determine whether we should go down that (oral) painful road". On when he was likely to begin the investigation, Mushwana said: "If we decide to go the route of oral hearings, these people will have to have their legal representatives - one can't say exactly when, but from my side I'm almost ready to go."
Ngcuka's spokesperson, Makhosini Nkosi, said the National Prosecuting Authority was "prepared to co-operate with any investigation into (its) running by any agency of government". "We remain steadfast in our belief and assertion that there was never any abuse of office," said Nkosi. "We have nothing to fear and we want this matter to be dealt with speedily so we don't have further disturbances, as was the case when we were defending the spying allegations." Asked to comment on Zuma's complaint about Ngcuka's statement, Nkosi said: "The national director will state his case to the Public Protector - it's not for me to state his case in the press."
Lakela Kaunda, speaking for Zuma, said: "The deputy president submitted his complaint and awaits feedback from the Public Protector and has no comment on the processes or any aspect of the investigation."
# Maharaj and mining magnate Brett Kebble have also filed "abuse of office" complaints with Mushwana.
Source: IoL
Friday, October 10, 2003
ANC tense as Hefer commission gets ready
Tensions in the ANC mounted at the weekend as the ruling party braced itself for a public airing of allegations from senior members that the national director of public prosecutions, Bulelani Ngcuka, was an apartheid spy.
It could prove to be the most testing few weeks for President Thabo Mbeki and his party since it swept to power in the country's first democratic elections in 1994 when a commission of enquiry, headed by Judge Joos Hefer, starts work on Monday.
There are fears that the ANC, which is already divided into opposing political camps over the Scorpions' investigation into Deputy President Jacob Zuma, could take further strain if those who made the accusations against Ngcuka - ANC veteran Mac Maharaj and senior government official Mo Shaik - disclose more information at the commission. There are fears that far from putting the spy controversy to rest, as it is intended to do, the commission could provide a platform for Maharaj and Shaik which could feed the tit-for-tat spy-naming and even tear the ANC apart along populist and technocrat lines. The threat of a split within the cabinet was made worse in August
It was announced by Justice minister Penuell Maduna on Thursday that the commission would be expanded to include an investigation into his own office, as line minister responsible for the national prosecuting authority, to ensure that there had been no abuse of the office as a result of "past obligations", a euphemism for spying for the apartheid regime. Zuma, who has consistently claimed that the investigation into his accepting an alleged R500 000 bribe from a French arms company is politically motivated, is expected to be called by the commission to substantiate his claims.
The fact that Zuma was the head of ANC intelligence when the organisation returned to South Africa from exile in 1990 has exacerbated the tensions and perceptions that there are two rival camps forming within the ANC over the suspended investigation into Zuma's alleged bribe. The threat of a split within the cabinet was made worse in August when Zuma allegedly won the day against Maduna when he tried to get a ruling, allegedly in line with Mbeki's wishes, that ANC officials should refrain from commenting on the Zuma affair. Between them, Zuma, as the former intelligence master, and Maharaj, as the former head of the underground Operation Vula, command widespread support within the ANC as was illustrated by Zuma's hero's welcome at Cosatu's annual conference last month and slogans denouncing Ngcuka.
Others expected to be called by the commission include Ngcuka, who is expected to attend the hearings throughout, Maduna, Maharaj, Mo Shaik, mining magnate Brett Kebble, MP Patricia de Lille, former Sunday Times journalist Ranjeni Munusamy, Schabir Shaik, Zuma's self-styled financial adviser who is facing trial on fraud charges, and, possibly a former spy master such as Niel Barnard or Mike Louw, who headed the apartheid-era National Intelligence Services. It is considered unlikely that Mbeki, who finds himself at the centre of the ANC's most bitter internal battle since coming to power in 1994, will be called to testify at the commission.
Commission sources said yesterday that it was already making provisions to sit for two months or more despite its brief to complete its work as soon as possible. It was earlier expected that the commission would sit for no longer than a month. Maduna, who himself was named as an apartheid spy when Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille read from a list of alleged ANC spies in parliament in 1997, is also under pressure for allegations of nepotism and corruption in the liquidation section of the justice department by a senior justice ministry official. Maduna also received a letter this week from mining magnate Brett Kebble in which it is understood that he accused Maduna and Ngcuka of undermining the justice department and abusing their official positions.
Kebble was allegedly named by Ngcuka in a derogatory context in an off-the-record briefing to black editors several months ago. Mbeki's legal adviser, Mojanku Gumbi, said yesterday that the inclusion of Maduna did not relate to allegations that he was an apartheid spy but was as a result of his position as the minister with line responsibility for Ngcuka's department.
Ngcuka stands accused by the likes of Maharaj, Mo Shaik and Brett Kebble of abusing his office by using it to get at his political enemies among who are those who resent his alleged role as an apartheid spy. Ngcuka has vigorously denied the claims and Mbeki has backed him up insisting that the "masses of the people" would not forgive those who made spying allegations.
Source: IoL
It could prove to be the most testing few weeks for President Thabo Mbeki and his party since it swept to power in the country's first democratic elections in 1994 when a commission of enquiry, headed by Judge Joos Hefer, starts work on Monday.
There are fears that the ANC, which is already divided into opposing political camps over the Scorpions' investigation into Deputy President Jacob Zuma, could take further strain if those who made the accusations against Ngcuka - ANC veteran Mac Maharaj and senior government official Mo Shaik - disclose more information at the commission. There are fears that far from putting the spy controversy to rest, as it is intended to do, the commission could provide a platform for Maharaj and Shaik which could feed the tit-for-tat spy-naming and even tear the ANC apart along populist and technocrat lines. The threat of a split within the cabinet was made worse in August
It was announced by Justice minister Penuell Maduna on Thursday that the commission would be expanded to include an investigation into his own office, as line minister responsible for the national prosecuting authority, to ensure that there had been no abuse of the office as a result of "past obligations", a euphemism for spying for the apartheid regime. Zuma, who has consistently claimed that the investigation into his accepting an alleged R500 000 bribe from a French arms company is politically motivated, is expected to be called by the commission to substantiate his claims.
The fact that Zuma was the head of ANC intelligence when the organisation returned to South Africa from exile in 1990 has exacerbated the tensions and perceptions that there are two rival camps forming within the ANC over the suspended investigation into Zuma's alleged bribe. The threat of a split within the cabinet was made worse in August when Zuma allegedly won the day against Maduna when he tried to get a ruling, allegedly in line with Mbeki's wishes, that ANC officials should refrain from commenting on the Zuma affair. Between them, Zuma, as the former intelligence master, and Maharaj, as the former head of the underground Operation Vula, command widespread support within the ANC as was illustrated by Zuma's hero's welcome at Cosatu's annual conference last month and slogans denouncing Ngcuka.
Others expected to be called by the commission include Ngcuka, who is expected to attend the hearings throughout, Maduna, Maharaj, Mo Shaik, mining magnate Brett Kebble, MP Patricia de Lille, former Sunday Times journalist Ranjeni Munusamy, Schabir Shaik, Zuma's self-styled financial adviser who is facing trial on fraud charges, and, possibly a former spy master such as Niel Barnard or Mike Louw, who headed the apartheid-era National Intelligence Services. It is considered unlikely that Mbeki, who finds himself at the centre of the ANC's most bitter internal battle since coming to power in 1994, will be called to testify at the commission.
Commission sources said yesterday that it was already making provisions to sit for two months or more despite its brief to complete its work as soon as possible. It was earlier expected that the commission would sit for no longer than a month. Maduna, who himself was named as an apartheid spy when Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille read from a list of alleged ANC spies in parliament in 1997, is also under pressure for allegations of nepotism and corruption in the liquidation section of the justice department by a senior justice ministry official. Maduna also received a letter this week from mining magnate Brett Kebble in which it is understood that he accused Maduna and Ngcuka of undermining the justice department and abusing their official positions.
Kebble was allegedly named by Ngcuka in a derogatory context in an off-the-record briefing to black editors several months ago. Mbeki's legal adviser, Mojanku Gumbi, said yesterday that the inclusion of Maduna did not relate to allegations that he was an apartheid spy but was as a result of his position as the minister with line responsibility for Ngcuka's department.
Ngcuka stands accused by the likes of Maharaj, Mo Shaik and Brett Kebble of abusing his office by using it to get at his political enemies among who are those who resent his alleged role as an apartheid spy. Ngcuka has vigorously denied the claims and Mbeki has backed him up insisting that the "masses of the people" would not forgive those who made spying allegations.
Source: IoL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)